Authors' reply to: Pandrowala and Shaikh et al.

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Authors' reply to letters from Egilman et al and Oliver et al

Dr Egilman and colleagues claim our report 1 implies that chrysotile does not cause mesothelioma. So did the International Chrysotile Association, the website of which highlighted our paper with the misleading headline 'reliable scientific data confirms negligible role of chryso-tile in UK patients with asbestos-related lung disease'. 2 Our results are consistent with the strong evidence that c...

متن کامل

Authors’ Reply to: VanderWeele et al., Chiolero, and Schooling et al.

inference is of course appealing. However, pragmatism cannot be really considered as a scientific method; it is essentially a practice. Further, this approach remains relatively vague, which is problematic as there is no point in estimating a causal effect that is not well defined, especially for ‘policy makers who will be unable to translate [this vague causal effect] into effective interventi...

متن کامل

Reply to Rao et al. and Lee et al

In the last issue, I presented a piece that called into question some of the techniques reported in two papers in high-profile journals that purported to provide statistical evidence for the linguistic status of some ancient symbol systems (Sproat 2010a). Not surprisingly the authors of those two papers took issue with a number of my claims, and have requested the opportunity to respond. The tw...

متن کامل

Reply to Gratiy et al.

TO THE EDITOR: Gratiy et al. (2013) proposed two alternative explanations for the nonbalanced current source density (CSD) estimates in Riera et al. (2012). Their commentary was based on a particular interpretation of the role played by the Ampere-Maxwell Law in the genesis of the electric fields for macroscopic media. In this Reply, we will provide further information to stimulate the debate i...

متن کامل

Reply to Neviere et al.

We would like to take the opportunity to express our appreciation towards Neviere et al. [1] for their eloquent and detailed comments on our recent manuscript [2]. In our study, 1-year follow-up results from cardiopulmonary exercise tests were compared in patients and controls with preoperative results. We were able to demonstrate a significant rise in the maximum cardiac index in patients duri...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment

سال: 2019

ISSN: 2590-3233

DOI: 10.4103/crst.crst_89_19